lutefisk (1.0.7+dfsg-7) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix the problem with the orig tar gz md5sum.
The original tarball was somehow not the good one.
-- Filippo Rusconi <lopippo@debian.org> Wed, 05 Aug 2020 11:06:53 +0200
lutefisk (1.0.7+dfsg-6) unstable; urgency=low
* d/control:
- Update Standards-Version: to 4.5.0.
- debhelper-compat (= 13) (remove d/compat).
- Fix Vcs-*.
* d/patches: add new patch to fix printf call.
* d/patches: add new patch to fix numerous format warnings.
* d/rules: remove the parallel flag.
-- Filippo Rusconi <lopippo@debian.org> Wed, 05 Aug 2020 06:17:02 +0200
lutefisk (1.0.7+dfsg-5) unstable; urgency=medium
* d/rules: indirect the make invocation through dh_auto_build so that
cross compilers are passed automatically and the cross build
succeeds (thanks Helmut Grohne <helmut@subdivi.de>)
* d/control: Update Standards-Version: to 4.0.0.
Update the Vcs fields.
-- Filippo Rusconi <lopippo@debian.org> Tue, 01 Aug 2017 09:14:23 +0200
lutefisk (1.0.7+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=medium
* mv upstream upstream/metadata
* Switch to more concise debhelper rules syntax.
-- Filippo Rusconi <lopippo@debian.org> Mon, 18 Aug 2014 11:46:48 +0200
lutefisk (1.0.7+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=low
* Force new version so that uploading will finally work. This time,
upload after dpkg-buildpackage -sa, so that the orig.tar.gz is
uploaded along with the other files. Indeed, the previous upload was
rejected (can't really understand why):
lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg-2.dsc: Invalid size hash for
lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg.orig.tar.gz:
According to the control file the size hash should be 270827,
but lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg.orig.tar.gz has 268306.
If you did not include lutefisk_1.0.7+dfsg.orig.tar.gz in you upload,
a different version might already be known to the archive software.
* This release should still close that bug (Closes: #753226).
-- Filippo Rusconi <lopippo@debian.org> Tue, 01 Jul 2014 11:18:33 +0200
lutefisk (1.0.7+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=low
* Fix the patches which were lacking a newline between the header and
the diffs. Thanks to Juhani Numminen <juhaninumminen0@gmail.com> for
submitting a patch (Closes: #753226).
* Set the VCS url to the canonical format.
* debian/rules: add a target to get the original source.
* Update Standards-Version: to 3.9.5.
-- Filippo Rusconi <lopippo@debian.org> Mon, 30 Jun 2014 16:13:38 +0200
lutefisk (1.0.7+dfsg-1) unstable; urgency=low
* new upstream version;
* applied patches as for previous version, but this time using the
dquilt setup. For that set the source format to 3.0 (quilt);
* debian/control: Standards-Version: 3.9.4 and set address to
lopippo@debian.org;
* set the basis for hardening stuff but commented out because would
require a lot of work. I let that for another release;
* set dpkg-dev (>= 1.16.1.1) to build depends for hardening stuff;
* debian/watch: new version of watch file from kind contribution of
Daniel Leidert <daniel.leidert@wgdd.de>;
* debian/get-orig-source.sh: script to get the original source, clean it
and make an orig tarball. Kind contribution from Daniel;
Leidert. (Closes: #675830; sorry Daniel that I somehow skipped the bug
report for so long);
* change debian/get-orig-source.sh so that awful doc file name is moved
to index.html;
* debian/rules: remove the renaming of the doc file since performed at
orig tarball constitution.
-- Filippo Rusconi <lopippo@debian.org> Tue, 04 Jun 2013 12:06:36 +0200
lutefisk (1.0.5a.cleaned-1) unstable; urgency=low
* Initial release (Closes: #527141);
* Removed file windoze/lutefisk.exe that was shipped in the upstream
tarball;
* Fixed glitches in the upstream source that had gcc emit warning
(#include <math.h> in two files and and replace 'NULL' with '\x0' to
test end of array in one file);
* Move the main HTML documentation file (space-ridden filename) to
index.html;
* Look for default files in /usr/share/lutefisk/, not current directory.
* Display usage help when no argument given.
* Protect against too long filenames (and raise the limit).
* Sponsored upload done by Lionel Elie Mamane <lmamane@debian.org>.
-- Filippo Rusconi <rusconi-debian@laposte.net> Wed, 09 Dec 2009 22:42:38 +0100